Promed.Watch takes a letter to the last post [ Wikipedia: FOSSA via so-called skeptics (GWUP, Brights) ] as an opportunity to take this opportunity to begin a data collection . We are looking for Wikipedia user, to the so-called skeptics movement are to organize in admin and user cliques: Vollmuller (purpose of mutual assistance in edit-wars) and Wikipedia with demonstrably false information. Here are some examples of the work of this group:
Wikipedia agitprop, and Nina Gerlach
Wikipedia blocked H. Journal - Admin »Gleiberg" helps Nina Gerlach
ELSEVIER: Alternative and Complementary Medicine - quality of Wikipedia articles
Wikipedia-criticism: Neural represented factually inaccurate and tendentious
As the case study shows Nina Gerlach, violates the community GWUP systematically to Wikipedia and some very aggressive against Wikipedia guidelines, but this leads to no consequences, because you can take here in a sense the "air superiority" claim for themselves. The prevailing thinking and behavior patterns similar to the EsoWatch community.
In the opinion of Promed.Watch there are interfaces between EsoWatch and the skeptic-roped on Wikipedia. The aim of this paper is to collect information in order to make this interface transparently. If new information, this blog post will be continually updated and maintained.
who (like the letter writer) with appropriate information, they can now deliver as blind Promed.Watch comment under this post. Blind commentary states that the comment is not enabled and only serves to exchange information.
following information is required: first Wikipedia user names, second link to the user account with Wikipedia, third grounds for believing that it is a member of the skeptic community at Wikipedia including a link (s) to the sources. 4th ground has failed why such person against Wikipedia rules. Important: In Schedule 2 included only people who have proven to violate Wikipedia guidelines . The opinion / perspective of the person concerned does not matter.
Promed.Watch will evaluate the data, first a rough sanity check to them after that to publish in two groups:
List 1: suspicion of membership in the skeptic community at Wikipedia
In this list User name recorded, the user activity of Promed.Watch has not been verified. In all cases mentioned above, the suspicion may be incorrect. It may be hard-working Wikipedia authors act, the editing in good faith and in compliance with Wikipedia policy. They've landed in a list, because a Promed.Watch reader believes that the person belongs to the skeptic community on Wikipedia. This suspicion may turn out to be right or wrong.
1/6/2010 letter to the editor:
Wikipedia-User: Hob Gadling
Wikipedia-User: Alex74
Wikipedia users: Jbo166
Wikipedia user: Rainer Wolf ( 12/11/2010: was checked and shifted in Schedule 2)
.
.
.
List 2: Occupied membership in the skeptic community at Wikipedia
This list user names are taken, the user's activity was reviewed. Here people are listed according to estimates by Promed.Watch known or almost certain probability of skeptics community on Wikipedia.
11/12/2010 Promed.Watch:
.
Wikipedia user: Rainer Wolf
Wikipedia user habil Rainer Wolf is not the retired biologist Dr. . Rainer to be confused Wolf . Promed.Watch assumes, however, that Wikipedia users Rainer Wolf is almost certainly an important member and functionary of the association GWUP eV. Wikipedia user Rainer Wolf is in the German Wikipedia to a powerful network of the skeptics movement, which also includes Nina Gerlach and Henriette Fiebig.
.
For Wikipedia article "GWUP" he takes a kind of wake function with the aim of critical messages to the club to ward off GWUP eV. The following link, see Wikipedia user Rainer Wolf as editor of the Wikipedia article "GWUP" . And on the following linked site makes Wikipedia user Rainer Wolf surreptitious advertising for anonymous Internet pillory EsoWatch.com (a project of the skeptics movement). - How Promed.Watch Others reported on 01.11.2010, the German judicial investigation for serious criminal offenses committed under EsoWatch.com against unknown (see: German judiciary is investigating EsoWatch.com ). See also donkey watch over EsoWatch.com.
.
.
06/01/2010 Promed.Watch:
Wikipedia users: Nina Gerlach
(very aggressive and dominant / uncompromising conduct is contrary to systematically against Wikipedia guidelines, is close to the club GWUP eV, EsoWatch-supporter, former board member of Wikimedia Germany eV)
Wikipedia users: Henriette Fiebig
(claims to a former member of the Association GWUP eV defended, Nina Gerlach in arbitration requests, see also: Wikipedia: Mediation Committee / problems between Nina and Michael S ), currently assistant (Community Assistant) of Wikimedia Germany eV) - the ideal starting point for the skeptic community to promote more at Wikipedia)
.
.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment